Those who follow Glenn Beck might be aware that Tuesday November 20th marked the release of his latest book, “Agenda 21,” the suspenseful and perhaps sobering tale of a futuristic America in which a UN-led program spawned an authoritarian state where individuals are stripped of all personal rights and freedoms. Oddly, Beck’s novel is not simply a work of fiction, but based on an actual program created by the United Nations by the very same name — “Agenda 21″ — which, according to the UN’s own website, is a “comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations system, governments and major groups, in every area in which human impacts on the environment.” In so many words, the United Nations seeks to co-opt, via individual governments, and eventually, a “one-world government,” privately held land under the auspices of ensuring its “sustainability.” Worse still, the UN’s Agenda 21 has even laid out plans for “depopulation” or rather, “population control.” If it sounds like something out of George Orwell’s 1984, that is because Agenda 21′s tenets are eerily in line with the demented alternate reality Orwell himself had imagined while scribing the pages of his famed novel. “Sustainable development” is the catch-phrase Beck urged his Monday evening viewers to be leery of. Where one can live and what land should be designated for would, under fully-realized Agenda 21 plan, be controlled by the United Nations and a future one-world government. Consider the following section from the UN website on Agenda 21′s plan for “promoting sustainable human settlement development.” Emphasis added:
Chilling Letter from Proctor & Gamble to Obama Who would have thought, and yet many are thinking it.
By Lou Pritchett, Procter & Gamble
A LETTER FROM A PROCTER AND GAMBLE EXECUTIVE TO THE PRESIDENT
* THE LAST SENTENCE IS THE MOST CHILLING
Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America ‘s true living legends
- an Acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world’s highest
Rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize
Him as the foremost leader in change management.. Lou changed the way
America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to
Be known as “partnering.”
Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and Gamble
and over the course of 36 years; made corporate history.
AN OPENLETTER TOPRESIDENT OBAMA
Dear President Obama:
You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike Any of the others, you truly scare me.
You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.
You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no Visible signs of support.
You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth Growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.
You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.
You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus Don’t understand it at its core.
You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others.
You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned Yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to Publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail..
You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America ‘ Crowd and deliver this message abroad.
You scare me because you want to change America to a European style Country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.
You scare me because you want to replace our health care system With a government controlled one.
You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly Capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.
You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose That lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of Living in the world.
You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics Against certain banks and corporations.
You scare me because your own political party shrinks from Challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.
You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider Opposing points of view from intelligent people.
You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both Omnipotent and omniscient.
You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything You do.
You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaugh’s, Hannitys, O’Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, Conservative points of view.
You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.
Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will Probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.
Lou Pritchett
* * This letter was sent to the NY Times but they never acknowledged it.
Big surprise. Since it hit the Internet, however, it has had over
500,000 hits. Keep it going. All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for
good men and women to do nothing.. It’s happening right now.
Dinesh D’souza: Obama is A Global Redistributor And “America Is The 1%”
Looking At Obama’s Dream
Obama’s America – Looking At Obama’s “Dream” For U.S.
Dinesh D’souza: Obama is A Global Redistributor & America Is The 1%!
2016 Obama’s America
We have a sociopath in the White House. A Sociopath is a person who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience. Barack Hussein Obama went to a Las Vegas for a fundraiser after briefly delaying his itinerary to speak on National Television regarding the death (assassination) of our Ambassador to Libya. In the last four years, Barack Hussein Obama has destroyed our economy, driven up the price of gasoline and energy, forced Americans to accept Obamacare, illegally advocated for Illegal Alien Amnesty via an Executive Order, engaged in a second Amendment plot via “Fast and Furious” in an attempt to disenfranchise gun ownership, stuffed the Supreme Court and lower courts with ideologue judges, stiffed us with massive failed stimulus packages, illegally disenfranchised preferred stock holders (GM), had government takeover private enterprises and has punished job creators.
His final legacy will be Quantitative Easing which means that the “Fed will print a ton of money” and will devalue the dollar. His lack of leadership in creating Fiscal Policy has forced Ben Bernake into a third round of Monetary policy. This in turn will create massive inflation so that oil, food, medicine and all imported goods and services will skyrocket.
“Printing money is the last refuge of failed empires and Banana Republics and the Fed doesn’t want to admit that this is their only idea”
The Obama Administration is simultaneously creating a Middle East Muslim Caliphate, distancing our support of Israel while weakening our Military, our Economy and attacking our freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution.
If we don’t Oust Obama in November, WWIII will erupt in the Middle East, we will be defenceless (Obama signed treaty that reduces our nuclear arsenal from 5000 to 1500 missiles and has asked the military to consider going down to 292) and after we plunge over the fiscal cliff, China will own our debt and our destiny!
Glenn Beck is one of our “Watchman on he Wall”. He warned us that The Obama Middle East Policy was leading to a Caliphate whose sole aim would be to march on Israel and to make Jerusalem their Capital. Last May, during a rally for Muslim Brotherhood presidential candidate Mohammad Mursi, Egyptian Cleric Safwat Higazi spoke before an adoring crowd of thousands, proclaiming, “We can see how the dream of the Islamic caliphate is being realized, God willing, by Dr. Mohamed Mursi.” Cleric Safwat Higazi further stated that, “The capital of the United States of the Arabs will be Jerusalem.”
It should now be clear to any neutral observer that the Obama Administration has via its “Arab Spring” and “American Weakness” foreign policy initiatives, have deliberately created a Muslim Caliphate.
On February 11th 2011, Glenn Beck talking about the Tunisian Revolution stated:
“This is not just happenstance. This is not just poor people mad at rich people.
This is coordinated. Tunisia was the beginning. I think there is a chance Tunisia
was our Archduke Ferdinand moment that I’ve been telling you about, warning
that it would start in some place that wouldn’t look like anything – and most of
us wouldn’t understand it. He was the guy assassinated in Sarajevo. Month later
Austria and Hungary declared war against Serbia and the rest is called World War One”
And now we see beginning of the Obama Administration’s and the Caliphate’s plan to obliterate Israel. Our Egyptian Embassy , upon orders from the president “apologizes in advance” for a motion picture uncomplimentary to Allah. An apology that comes before the attacks on our Egyptian and Libyan Embassies. After mobs assemble outside our Libyan embassy, our Ambassador is taken to a safe house under the protection of Libya. Our good friends in the Libyan Government then aid the Muslim Brotherhood by providing the location of our Ambassador’s “Safe House”, thereby enabling his murder along with other embassy personnel l. Obama waits before announcing the deaths of our Embassy personnel even while it is making headlines in Europe. When he finally speaks, he soft peddles the entire atrocity and can’t wait to get on Air Force One, so he is not too late for his Fundraiser.
Here are Michelle Malkin’s Take on the Middle east Chaos:
U.S. Jobless Claims Unchanged At 374,000
By Jeffry Bartash Published August 30, 2012 MarketWatch Pulse
WASHINGTON – Applications for U.S. jobless benefits were flat last week at a seasonally adjusted 374,000, the Labor Department said Thursday. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch had projected claims would fall to 370,000. Initial claims from two weeks ago were revised up to 374,000 from an original reading of 372,000, based on more complete data collected at the state level.
The average of new claims over the past month, meanwhile, rose by 1,500 to 370,250. The four-week average reduces seasonal volatility in the weekly data and is seen as a more accurate barometer of labor-market trends. Also, Labor said continuing claims decreased by 5,000 to a seasonally adjusted 3.32 million in the week ended Aug. 18. Continuing claims reflect the number of people already receiving benefits. About 5.53 million people received some kind of state or federal benefit in the week ended Aug. 11, down 62,253 from the prior week. Total claims are reported with a two-week lag.
Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2012/08/30/us-jobless-claims-unchanged-at-374000/#ixzz252k2eSbq
A congressional report concluded Friday that “political pressure” by a White House eager to tout stimulus spending was largely to blame for fast-tracking the ill-fated $535 million Solyndra loan guarantee — findings compounded by the release of an email that showed the former CEO once referred to the aid as “The Bank of Washington.”
The email and the report were released by Republicans, who continue to use the scandal to portray the Obama administration as careless with taxpayer money in pursuit of its alternative-energy agenda.
The email, posted online by the Republican National Committee, was a late 2009 message from ex-CEO Chris Gronet. “The Bank of Washington continues to help us!” he exclaimed, pointing to the recently approved loan guarantee and other tax incentives the company might use.
The report, meanwhile, was released by Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and caps a nearly yearlong investigation by the panel into why the government allegedly ignored red flags to approve the loan. Solyndra, a solar-panel firm, filed for bankruptcy last year.
“It is clear (the Department of Energy) should never have issued the loan guarantee to Solyndra,” the report said, adding that a subsequent decision to restructure the terms “violated the plain language of the law.”
The report, which follows another GOP-authored congressional study earlier this week on the Justice Department’s Fast and Furious scandal, is sure to fuel an election-year furor over questionable taxpayer investments in private companies.
The Obama administration has argued that the overall loan guarantee program has been successful and critical to supporting alternative energy innovators. In response Thursday, the administration blasted the GOP report and defended the integrity of the program.
“This is month 18 of this congressional investigation and everything disclosed … affirms what we said on day one: this was a merit based decision made by the Department of Energy,” White House spokesman Eric Schultz said. “As Republicans won’t answer how much investigation has cost taxpayers, we believe they should instead be focused on legislation to creating jobs and grow the economy.”
But an overriding theme in Thursday’s report is that the Department of Energy was under pressure from the beginning in 2009 to approve the Solyndra loan guarantee despite warning signs.
“This report conclusively shows that DOE pushed forward with the guarantee despite these warnings because of the Obama administration’s desire to use the Solyndra guarantee to highlight its stimulus,” the report said.
“A 123 Systems, the “green,” federal stimulus-funded lithium ion battery manufacturer, announced atrocious quarterly results today. Most expected that A 123‘s results would be dark red. What was a surprise was the simultaneous announcement that the company had entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with a Chinese industrial group, Wanxiang, that will give the Chinese control of the company.”
Green Battery Maker- A123′s Deal With China (More TaxPayer Cash Wasted) - China Could see 80% of Control of Lithium Ion technology.
A123 Systems Rallies On China Firm Investment
By Steve Gelsi Published August 08, 2012 MarketWatch Pulse
NEW YORK – Battery maker A123 Systems Inc. jumped 23% to 58 cents a share on Wednesday after the Waltham, Mass., company said Wanxiang Group Corp. will invest up to $450 million in the firm. The investment from Wanxiang, China’s largest automotive component maker, is intended to create the capital structure necessary for A123 Systems to continue growing its business, the company said. “Alignment with Wanxiang is also expected to substantially strengthen A123′s access to the growing vehicle electrification and grid-scale energy storage markets in China,” the company said.
China’s CNOOC Ltd. (0883.HK) said Monday it has reached an agreement to acquire Canadian oil and gas producer Nexen Inc. (NXY) for $15.1 billion in cash.
In China’s biggest overseas energy acquisition to-date, CNOOC will pay $27.50 per share for Nexen, representing a 61% premium to their closing price on Friday on the New York Stock Exchange.
State-owned CNOOC is China’s largest offshore oil company. The deal will give it ownership of oil and gas reserves in western Canada, the U.K. North Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and offshore Nigeria.
In 2012, approximately 70% of Nexen’s output is expected to come from offshore fields, according to Nexen’s website, making it a good fit for the Chinese company’s offshore fields. In 2011, Nexen produced around 207,000 barrels a day of oil equivalent.
Nexen, which describes itself as a major player in Canada’s oilsands sector, is also a producer of shale gas, in northeastern British Columbia.
In a statement on the Hong Kong stock exchange, CNOOC said it will fund the deal through existing cash resources and external financing. Nexen’s current debt of around $4.3 billion will remain outstanding, CNOOC said.
If the deal is approved by Nexen shareholders, Nexen will become a wholly owned subsidiary of CNOOC, the statement said.
Has an Obama gaffe finally revealed his innermost contempt for America, our Constitution and our traditional institutions? A contempt so deep and so villainous to American Principles and Values that he had to keep it concealed from public view. Hidden lest his villainous ideology be exposed and ruin his wicked plan to destroy America’s most cherished constitutional, social and economic institutions. Every once and a while those seers of our American culture would get a glimpse of his veiled intent and would alert our populous who either would not or could not believe that an American President could be capable of such infamous deeds.Then last Monday night while speaking at a fundraiser in Oakland last, Obama momentarily removed his superficial cloak as he told a mob of supporters that, “Just like we’ve tried their plan, we’ve tried our plan, and it worked. That’s the difference. That’s the choice in this election. That’s why I’m running for a second term.” He thereby, perhaps unconsciously, revealed his ongoing plan to subvert and destroy America.
The Top 50 Obama Short comings-50 reasons not to vote for Obama
1. Obamacare
2. The failed $850 billion stimulus
3. High, persistent unemployment
4. Gas prices
5. The 2012 budget’s fecklessness
6. Massive deficits each and every year
7. The seizure of GM and Chrysler, the transfer of bondholder wealth to unions, and the dumping of the GM stock at a loss
9. Hostility to Israel, including attack on apartment expansion and icing of Prime Minister Netanyahu in basement of White House
10. Failure to support Iran’s Green Revolution
11. Failure to support Syrian revolution
12. The Libyan Fiasco
13. The incompetent handling of the Gulf Oil disaster
14. The unnecessary permitorium in the aftermath of the Gulf Oil disaster
15. The shutdown of Shell’s Arctic oil exploration by EPA
16. The president’s push for cap-and-tax in the Congress
17. The president’s attempt to unconstitutionally impose cap-and-tax via EPA when the Congress wouldn’t pass cap-and-tax
18. The president’s push for unconstitutional restrictions on free speech on his political enemies while keeping the unions free to spend money on campaigns via The Disclose Act
19. The president’s attempt to unconstitutionally impose The Disclose Act on his political opponents but not unions via Executive Order
20. The president’s use of unaccountable “czars”
21. The president’s refusal to accept Congressional direction vis-a-vis his “czars” contained in the last 2011 Continuing Resolution
22. The president’s verbal assault on the Supreme Court while the members of the Court sat before him in the state of the Union
23. The president and Eric Holder’s politicization of the Department of Justice, including the black panthers case and the refusal to defend DOMA
24. The president’s use of demonizing rhetoric towards his opponents, such as accusing doctors of performing unnecessary surgery for money
25. The president’s hyper-partisan approach to governing including “I won, you lost” in 2009 and the assault on Paul Ryan with Paul Ryan as an invited guest in the president’s April 2011 “deficit speech.”
26. Bowing to the Saudi King and the Japanese emperor
27. Returning the bust of Churchill to Great Britain
28. Removing the missile shield from Poland and the Czech Republic
29. Backing the would-be dictator of Hondorus when that nation’s Supreme Court rightfully removed him from office
30. Failure to push for quick ratification of free trade agreements with Columbia, Panama and South Korea
31. Indecision on Afghanistan surge coupled with announcement of eventual withdrawal.
32. Incoherence on Egypt, most obviously with the dispatch of Frank Wizner and then rejection of Wizner’s advice vis-a-vis Mubarak.
33. Appointment Craig Beck to NLRB via recess appointment
34. Appointment of FCC commissioners who are pursuing “net neutrality” without Congressional authorization
35. Failure to resume full water deliveries to California’s Central Valley because of the Delta Smelt
36. Attempt to close Guantanamo Bay
37. Attempt to try terrorists in New York City
38. Janet “The System Worked” Napolitano
39. Government takeover of the student loan program
40. Cancellation of “virtual border fence” project with no replacement or indeed concern for border security
41. The “Beer Summit” and the attack on the Cambridge Police Department
42. The Department of Justice’s attack on Arizona for that state’s exercise of its sovereign legislative authority on the issue of citizen identification rules
43. The attack on Scott Walker and Wisconsin for the governor’s and the state legislature’s exercise of their sovereign legislative authority on public employment issues
44. Dabbling in basketball brackets while the Middle East fell into chaos and the gas prices skyrocketed
45. Arguing that American exceptionalism was the same as any nation’s sense of exceptionalism
46. Implying that Minnesota bridge collapse was the result of lack of infrastructure funding
47. Inserting himself into campaign for the Olympics
48. Attack on D.C. voucher program
49. Van Jones and a long list of other appointees
50. Teleprompter dependency and the worst run of presidential rhetoric since Millard Fillmore combined with testiness in the few interviews he grants.
For The First Time in History The Average Household In Canada Is Worth More Than Us.
Canada has national Energy Policy The Rise Fossil Fuel Has been the Rise of Canada!
If you think that this cannot or will not happen in our state….you are sadly mistaken. Read the last section!
The following charts and discussions present an easy to understand view of Barack Hussein Obama’s DAMAGING accomplishments. I would suggest that you pass this information along to those citizens who do not follow political or economic news, but nevertheless vote .
If Obama was the CEO of a Corporation, the following operational , statistics would be just cause to have him booted out of office by his stockholders and Board of Directors.
Charts on the Obama Years
NOW for the final exam:
1. Why is California so broke?
California
Just One State , this is only one State…………… If this doesn’t open your eyes nothing will !
From the L. A. Times
1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County ( L. A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash and are not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal aliens working without a green card.
2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.
3. 75% of people on the most-wantedlist in Los Angelesare illegal aliens.
4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers.
5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationalshere illegally.
6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles Countyare living in garages.
7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angelesare mostlikely illegal aliens from south of the border.
8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD propertiesare illegal.
9. 21 radio stations in L. A. AreSpanish speaking.
10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 4.9 million speak Spanish. (There are 10.2 million people in L. A. County .)
(All 10 of the above statements are from the Los Angeles Times)
Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.
Over 70% of the United States ‘ annual population growth (and over 90% of California’s , Florida’s , and New York’s ) results from immigration.
29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.
HOW CAN YOU HELP?
Send copies of this letter to at least two other people. 100 would be even better.
This is only one State. The Nancy Pelosi crowd wants illegals to be given the right to vote so that their dependency on “Free” food stamps, Welfare, Medicaid etc., drives the United States towards becomes a single political party nation!
The Senate on Thursday blocked a move to speed along the approval and construction of the controversial Keystone pipeline, after the White House lobbied Democrats to oppose it.
A total of 11 Democrats, though, ended up breaking with the president to vote for the Republican-backed amendment — at a time when gas prices are rising and pipeline supporters are using that trend to pressure the administration to act.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said after the vote that the Democrat-controlled Senate had “turned its back on job creation and energy independence in a single vote.”
McConnell, referring to reports later confirmed by the White House that Obama personally lobbied Democrats to oppose the measure, also used the vote to place blame for the pipeline’s delay squarely on the president.
“President Obama’s personal pleas to wavering senators may have tipped the balance against this legislation. When it comes to delays over Keystone, anyone looking for a culprit should now look no further than the Oval Office,” he said.
The amendment, to a massive transportation bill, actually garnered a majority of senators, with 56 voting in favor it. However, the amendment needed to reach a 60-vote threshold.
The proposal would have taken Obama out of the Keystone decision-making process. The move comes after the administration rejected a cross-border permit for the Canada-to-Texas pipeline — citing environmental concerns as well as the attempt by Republicans to force an early decision.
Construction is moving ahead on the southern portion of that pipeline from Oklahoma to Texas, but the company, TransCanada, must reapply for the northern section that crosses the U.S. border.
Republicans in Congress and on the presidential campaign trail have used the Keystone pipeline issue as a rallying cry — and proof for their argument that Obama’s energy policy is hostile to oil and gas exploration and the economic benefits that come with it.
“It just seems that we are turning our back on (energy) independence from the rest of the world, which would clearly help our consumers as it relates to their pocketbooks,” Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said at a hearing Thursday where Energy Secretary Steven Chu testified.
Chu, during the hearing, said he was not involved in efforts to sway senators to oppose the Keystone vote.
After taking heat for earlier comments that some said suggested the department was not looking to lower gas prices, Chu said Thursday that the administration “wants very much to do what we can to lower the price of gasoline.”
While Obama lost nearly a dozen Democratic senators on the Keystone vote Thursday, he won enough support to prevent the measure from passing.
Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., was among those who announced his opposition to the amendment ahead of the voting. He said he supports the Keystone project, but that environmental considerations need to be taken into account.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, ahead of the vote, accused Republicans of playing politics with the Keystone issue and disputed any suggestion that speeding the process would somehow lower gas prices.
On the Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., echoed those comments.
“Even if we produced more oil in the United States that’s not going to lower the price of gasoline here,” Waxman said, since oil is priced on the world market. He said Republicans are “playing politics with this issue.”
In In Brazil, Energy Finds Put Country at a Whole New Power Level
By SIMON ROMERO
RIO DE JANEIRO — Of all those who might smile at Brazil’s unfolding oil boom, Walter Link could rank near the top. A U.S. oilman here at a time of nationalist fervor, he was the former chief geologist for Standard Oil Company of New Jersey whom Brazil hired to find its oil reserves.
The year was 1954. Petrobras, the newly created national oil company, put the blunt, Indiana-born Link to work creating Brazil’s oil exploration sector. Six long years ensued before he issued his polemical “Link Report,” describing tepid results. For Brazil to meet its oil needs, he recommended going offshore or abroad.
Petrobras grew at its own impressive pace for decades, mixing progress with setbacks as Brazil struggled with drawn-out dependence on foreign oil. But Petrobras’s huge offshore oil discoveries in recent years now enable its leaders to contend that it could surpass Exxon Mobil — called Standard Oil in Walter Link’s day — as the world’s largest publicly-traded oil company.
“Petrobras is engaged in by far the biggest industrial undertaking in Brazil’s history,” said Norman Gall, director of the Fernand Braudel Institute of World Economics in São Paulo.
Mr. Gall said Petrobras’s annual spending, estimated at more than $45 billion through 2020, might surpass NASA’s budget in the 1960s — when it was preparing to send a man to the moon.
Brazil, which is maintaining investments to increase oil production even as turmoil hits financial markets in Brazil and around the world, is leading a shift in Latin America’s oil industry with the potential to alter the geopolitics of energy.
By the 2020s, if the stars align in Brazil’s favor, the country could emerge as the fourth-largest oil producer after Russia, Saudi Arabia and the United States.
Brazil’s rise as an oil power is part of a broader expansion of the Western Hemisphere’s energy output, especially in the United States and Canada. But it also offers a vivid example of the reordering of Latin America’s energy hierarchy in which traditional energy exporters like Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia are seeing their sway eclipsed by nations with big discoveries.
Emerging exploration technologies like those capable of tapping rock formations by combining horizontal drilling with hydraulic fracturing explain some of the focus on the region’s potential to produce new oil kings.
In May, for instance, Argentina announced its biggest oil discovery since the 1980s in a sprawling Patagonian shale deposit, luring new interest from foreign companies like Apache Corporation and Exxon Mobil.
Argentina ranked third in the world, after China and the United States, in shale gas reserves with about 22 trillion cubic meters, or 774 trillion cubic feet, according to a report released in April by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Neighboring Paraguay and Uruguay, both marginal energy players, also boast enviable shale reserves, as do swaths of southern Brazil. Mexico, a traditional oil powerhouse where nationalist policies have kept large output increases in check, has huge shale gas reserves ranked fourth in the world.
Beyond the focus on shale, energy strategists say Latin America’s profile is set to rise as the global economy relies more on a range of energy sources, like sugarcane ethanol and the lithium found in the vast salt flats high in the Andes. New discoveries in recent months also underscore the potential to open new oil frontiers.
For instance, Tullow Oil, the British oil company that made a huge 2007 discovery off the coast of Ghana, said in September that it had found oil off French Guiana’s coast, in a basin that may be geologically similar to West Africa.
Elsewhere in South America, the exodus of Venezuelan petroleum engineers after President Hugo Chávez purged Venezuela’s oil industry of dissident employees is lifting the fortunes of neighboring Colombia, where output has roughly doubled in five years to almost one million barrels a day.
If Colombia improves security conditions further, officials see production climbing to 1.7 million barrels by 2020. In Brazil alone, output may increase from just above two million barrels a day to more than five million by 2020, about the equivalent of adding another Kuwait to world oil production.
The region’s oil boom is notable not just for rising producers but also because energy-rich countries in Venezuela’s ideological sphere of influence, which have asserted greater state control of natural resources, are largely being excluded from the output gains.
“We’re coming to the end of the cycle of leftist ideology-driven politics in Latin America, which were a reaction to the free-market ideas fashionable in the ’90s,” said Roger Tissot, an independent energy consultant. “More centrist positions are starting to prevail.”
Perhaps no country in the region better illustrates its potential — and its capacity to fall short — than Venezuela, which surpassed Saudi Arabia this year as the nation with the largest oil reserves, at 1.19 trillion barrels.
Pointing to the influence that Venezuela might possibly wield in global markets, the U.S. Geological Survey said that just one of its hydrocarbon assets, the heavy oil found in an area called the Orinoco Belt, called the Faja in Venezuela, is the largest oil accumulation it ever assessed.
But that geological good fortune arguably has not translated into broader energy clout for Venezuela. The country’s regional influence has waned in recent years as its national oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela, has struggled to raise output while focusing on other objectives like subsidized food distribution.
Venezuelan energy laws remain more welcoming to foreigners than those in Saudi Arabia or Mexico. But oil executives contend that a range of factors limit the advance of projects, including the difficulty in attaining financing in a country prone to nationalization and ceding control to Petróleos de Venezuela.
“The oil is there, but the conditions, both financial and physical, are so far from ready for prime time that getting foreigners to risk money in the Faja is one tough slog,” said Francisco Toro, founder of the Venezuelan political blog Caracas Chronicles.
While Venezuela and Brazil maintain warm ties with one another, and have even explored collaborating on a refinery project in northeastern Brazil, one country’s loss is effectively another’s gain in regional political heft.
Brazil’s new naval buildup, for instance, would give its military a heavier presence from its deepwater oil fields into South Atlantic sea lanes.
Other countries in the region, notably Colombia, have taken note of Brazil’s experience in the 1990s of exposing Petrobras to market forces by issuing shares that now trade in São Paulo and New York, while still maintaining state control.
Of course, big challenges still await Brazil’s energy industry. The devilish complexity of producing oil from its “pre-salt” discoveries off the coasts of the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, located in water 3,000 meters, or 9,800 feet, deep and beneath about 4,000 meters of salt, sand and rock, have some investors questioning whether Petrobras is overextending itself.
Just one discovery made in 2007, called Tupi at the time and now renamed Lula, may hold as much as eight billion barrels of oil and natural gas, making it a contender for second-largest field discovered in the past two decades, behind Kazakhstan’s Kashagan Field.
The logistics of the new offshore fields, located so far into the Atlantic that Petrobras needs entire platforms midway to the coast where workers can sojourn between land and sea, are not the only challenges.
Bitter talks between Brasília and regional officials over royalties could delay development of new fields, and portend protracted revenue disputes. Middle East oil remains cheaper to produce, while cost overruns here could limit the ability to meet output targets.
Energy historians also warn that the bounty off Brazil’s coast could become a resource curse when big inflows from oil exports start streaming in.
Brazilian leaders, guiding a highly diversified economy, seem aware of the risks. They have taken the important step of creating a sovereign wealth fund to invest some revenues.
The prophetic Venezuelan oil minister, Juan Pablo Pérez Alfonzo, who helped create OPEC five decades ago, understood an oil bonanza’s hazards. He disparaged his country’s triumphalism and spending sprees and what he called “economic indigestion,” when officials focused on megaprojects and neglected essentials like education.
“A wave of money,” Mr. Pérez Alfonzo warned in the 1970s when Venezuela’s prospects seemed as promising as Brazil’s today, “can destroy as well as create.”